34.4 C
Manila
Friday, April 19, 2024

Martial Law omission a mockery of history

The
Marcoses want Philippine history revised to portray the late dictator Ferdinand
Marcos Sr. as a hero and a good leader, and to escape accountability for the
family’s atrocities and economic plunder during Martial Law. The recent
proposal of Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. for the revision of
history books is aligned with the scheme for the complete return of his family to
power. This historical revisionism should not be allowed to aggravate current
learning that distracts from promoting historical and social awareness among
the youth. 

In
pushing to revise history, the Marcoses are evidently basking in the successive
court victories they have been securing under the current administration. They
have been enjoying freedom and have even been installed in government, as if
their crimes against the Filipino people have been forgotten. These follow the Duterte
government-sanctioned hero’s burial for the late dictator.

Yet
there have been court decisions damning the Marcoses. Thousands of human rights
violations victims during Martial Law have won in the class suit filed in the
US Federal court in Hawaii in 1995 seeking indemnification. They received
compensation, albeit insufficient for all the suffering, from the ill-gotten
wealth of the Marcoses. Imelda Marcos has also been found guilty by a
Sandiganbayan court of seven counts of graft on November 9, 2018.

The Filipinos also remain burdened by the neoliberal policies
which the Marcos regime started to implement. Case in point, many students and
parents today continue to suffer from the commercialization of education as a
result of the Education Act of 1982. Filipinos continue to suffer a government
burdened by debt, while the Marcos family and their cronies enjoy the fruits of
ill-gotten wealth including from dictatorship debt. Since the Marcos regime
began implementing neoliberal economics, the agriculture and industrial sectors
of Philippine society have headed downhill.

To
say that schools have been teaching children lies with the discussion of
Martial Law mocks the collective experience of civil, political, economic and
social rights violations against the Filipino people during the dark days of
the Marcos dictatorship. All the materials that narrate this part of history
contribute to forming students’ consciousness and resolve to value democracy and
to disallow all attempts to undermine it. There are forums and discussions,
several books and writings, as well as multimedia materials featuring the
accounts of Martial Law survivors. There are also Filipino historians,
economists, academics and those from other fields, discussing Marcos’
atrocities and economic plunder. Schools may also visit the Bantayog ng mga
Bayani in Quezon City, a “memorial center honoring those individuals who
lived and died in defiance of the repressive regime that ruled over the
Philippines from 1972 to 1986.”

As
teachers and members of the Educators’ Forum for Development (EFD), we push
that rather than revise history, the education sector must continue to include
Martial Law in the curriculum and provide students with corresponding
historically accurate books and other educational materials. We stand by the
proven accounts of thousands of human rights victims during martial rule, and
oppose any attempt to muddle the truth. Revising the truth about Martial Law and
teaching the untruth in schools, as proposed by Bongbong Marcos, will diminish
the Filipino people’s historical and continuing movement and struggle against
tyranny and fascism, and present to the youth a distorted image of leaders and
an ill concept of governance.

The
teaching of history is integral to the study of the Filipino identity. A
student equipped with the lessons of the past would more likely use a critical
lens in understanding the present and discerning what must be avoided in the
future. A critical student has a correct sense of history which includes both
the glorious and the abhorrent. A critical student knows that being a
government official is not an entitlement for abuse but a responsibility to
serve the best interests of the people. 

Historical
revisionism has no place in any school. Let us continue to teach the truth
about Martial Law. The need to do so never wavers. A government upholding
neoliberal policies unopposed will spawn authoritarian rulers or dictators bent
on pursuing and furthering an economic path favoring the few rich and powerful.
###

Photo from Kodao Productions

Latest news

- Advertisement -spot_img

Related news

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.