32.7 C
Manila
Friday, April 26, 2024
Home Blog Page 141

Filipino playwright seeks asylum, receives prestigious UK theater grant

0

By: Eunice Barbara C. Novio

INQUIRER.net /August 04, 2020

In his London flat, Rogelio Braga was busy typing on his laptop, in between answering emails, queries, and interviews from his caseworker. Rogelio was writing a play entitled Miss Philippines. No, it is not about statuesque beauties whose feet barely touched the earth. It is about real women, lesbian, and transgender women, barely surviving the life in the slums under Duterte’s war on drugs.

It is the same play he submitted to the Yellow Earth Theater earlier in 2020 and has been awarded £2000 seed commissions to develop new plays as part of the Professional Writers Programme 2020-22.

Rogelio is the first Filipino to ever receive the award since the program was launched in 2017. He is also the first Filipino writer seeking asylum in the United Kingdom due to threats of extra-judicial killing in the Philippines under the Duterte regime.

The Yellow Earth

Rogelio is among the four chosen playwrights including Lao Lee, Nemo Martin, and Marie Yan as part of the Professional Writers Programme 2020-22. They will be under the mentorship of director and dramaturg Ng Choon Ping. The seed commission will also include one-to-one dramaturgy meetings and development workshops with actors and directors over two years. They were selected out of 17 writers participating in Phase 1 of the Programme, according to the Yellow Earth Theater website. One of their objectives is more representation of BESEA in the UK’s theatre industry.

“This is an opportunity to amplify the voices of the dispossessed and of the powerless and in so doing bring awareness and education to UK audiences. I hope it inspires other writers who find themselves in similar situations to Rogelio to take courage and keep writing and for venues and organizations to listen and support,” Kumiko Mendl, Yellow Earth Theater artistic director says.
Mendl explains that plays can be hugely powerful because they can provoke, challenge, shock, and have the power to move hearts and minds.

Yellow Earth Theatre, formed in 1995 by five British East Asian (BEA) actors — Kwong Loke, Kumiko Mendl, Veronica Needa, David KS Tse, and Tom Wu — is a multi-awarded theatre company based in London. They develop British East and Southeast Asia (BESEA) theatre makers through their various programs and productions.

“When we read his ideas for his play Miss Philippines we were immediately alerted to the power and importance of this story, the pain and suffering he was sharing through his characters but also the incredibly vibrant and rich world they inhabited. These are the voices of women that have not been heard in this country and we felt strongly this story needs to be told,” Kumiko says.

The playwright

Miss Philippines is Rogelio’s first work for the stage written entirely in English.

Rogelio Braga during a lecture on Philippine Literary Landscape with the Filipino migrants in London. He is the first Filipino writer seeking asylum in the UK under the Duterte regime.

“I wrote this for British audiences. I wrote plays thinking of a specific audience; I always look at theatre performances as a communal enterprise, the production, and consumptions of meanings is always communal,” Rogelio says to Inquirer.net via video call.

He also plans to adapt Miss Philippines for Filipino audiences in the future.

Rogelio is also known for his novel ‘Colon’ published by Balangiga Press in 2016. Colon is a historical fiction about the war in Mindanao. The protagonist is a woman named Blesilda. Her life was intertwined with the war in Mindanao between the Moro people and the Philippine Government during the Martial Law and beyond.

“Rogelio’s passion for his craft and his commitment to telling stories of the people he knows and the country he loves and the lengths he has gone to be able to continue to do that is truly humbling,” Kumiko says.

Despite the seriousness of his plays, Rogelio brings forth from each of them humanity, warmth, and humour, Kumiko says.

“Since 2017 I’ve been thinking of writing about Duterte and his supporters’ (alleged) extra-judicial killings in the Philippines as someone who has witnessed it and who has lived in a community where neighbors died from extra-judicial killings,” Rogelio tells me via video call.

His controversial play, Ang mga Maharlika performed by UP Repertory in September 2017 was supposed to be toured in several venues that year but the producers decided to cancel the shows due to intimidations and death threats to the actors and production staff from the supporters and loyalists of the Marcoses and Duterte. It was also banned on Facebook. The play was based on Dovie Beam’s biography written by Hermie Rotea, an exiled journalist. It was banned in the Philippines by former First Lady Imelda Marcos.

“I have death threats as early as 2017 but I just dismissed them as I considered it as part of the bargain if you go public as a writer and a playwright critical of the regime,” Rogelio explains.

Rogelio had a copy of the book but it was stolen in his drawers inside the Faculty of the School of Languages, Humanities, and Social Sciences at the Mapua University where he taught.

Later, the threats were just no longer online messages and phone calls from strangers, but also ‘visits’ in his apartment. His family and friends were also put in danger.

The student

In September 2018, Rogelio came to the United Kingdom to pursue a postgraduate degree in Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict at Birkbeck, the University of London as a Chevening Scholar.

“I intend to stay here for ten months and then to return home to my work and research endeavors in Mindanao. I was unable to return since February last year. I left my small publishing house, a start-up theatre company, my books, house, my cats, and the various research endeavors and projects back in the Philippines,” Rogelio explains.

Rogelio finished his postgraduate program in 2019.

The Asylum seeker

Despite being abroad, Rogelio’s family informed him of strangers asking for his whereabouts.

He has no option but to seek protection from the British government because his student visa was about to expire.

Before the lockdown, Rogelio was active in promoting his works among the migrant Filipino community and attending conferences.

In a lockdown, Rogelio stays in his small flat, writing and helping people in a similar situation.

“I volunteer for Campaign for Human Rights in the Philippines, a rights organization based here in London while being supported by Kanlungan Filipino Consortium,” Rogelio says.

“With what’s happening in the country now, attacks on human rights, attacks on press freedom and freedom of expression, the weaponization of the COVID-19 pandemic to silence the critics of the government and to totally dismantle our democratic institutions, I am not really sure now if the country is a safe space for writers and playwrights like me,” Rogelio explains.

The playwright and the motherland

“I no longer have a motherland. I am no different from the victims of extra-judicial killings in the archipelago; I’ve gone to the same process of this regime of systematically dehumanizing a Filipino body: first, the regime would strip you of your human rights such as to live, to free speech and expression, then this process would automatically reduce you to a bare body breathing, moving, weightless, without citizenship,” Rogelio says.

Rogelio denounces the supporters of President Duterte over their public approval of the killings.

The Duterte regime and its supporters made them first stateless people in this ‘War on Drugs’ before they were summarily executed, he says.

“The only difference is that I was fortunate enough to leave,” Rogelio says. “My country now is the stories I will tell, the stage I’ll create, and the dreams that I want to fulfill—and this could be anywhere perpetually suspended in a language that I am free to express. A country that could kill a Filipino is not my country. My countrymen? Those who love me and could protect me from harm.”

‘Take care’

Despite his status in the United Kingdom, Rogelio continues his resistance through his various articles.

“Take care of each other, of yourself, and organize. We have a struggle to win and a life to live. If this could be a consolation from the dire situation of being thrown out and stripped of your humanity, just remember that life is too short to be born and just die a Filipino. You don’t need to look back in anger. You don’t need to look back, at all,” Rogelio ends.

EDV

Politics and resistance under a lockdown regime

The pandemic is forcing us to be more critical of the repressive state even as we reexamine our methods and ideas about doing politics under the so-called new normal.

Citizens started to wear protective face masks at almost the same time when the state’s authoritarian identity is laid bare with little or no effort to hide its beastly features. It is as if those in power have found it necessary and desirable to inform the public that rights will be restricted, surveillance will be intensified, and the state will intrude into the personal lives of citizens in dealing with the pandemic.

Suddenly, the representative of the state is no longer the amiable type of public servant but an authoritative figure who impose harsh lockdowns and control the movement of people. The duty of citizens in a supposedly democratic society was downgraded as mere followers of what authorities are telling them what to do. Obey or resist at your own risk.

It seems new roles were assigned with many citizens choosing to be submissive, and politicians pretending to be experts in making decisions sans public consultation. Fear of the invisible enemy numbed many to silence. Fear was heightened to the level which could discourage people to feel and express outrage. Fear was used for insidious political ends.

But this was done without triggering a backlash even if the truth about the brutality of the state is already exposed. Worse, the aggressive actions of the state are justified as a desperate response during an emergency situation. Apparently, conservatives in power can now realize their fascist fantasies and win public approval at the same time.

They highlight the narrative that the threat is no longer the strong arm of the state but a deadly new virus. Hence, the need for coercive measures to stop the spread of infections.

Under normal times, a person is innocent until proven guilty. Today, everyone is a suspected virus carrier until it is determined that his or her body temperature is normal. Individuals confess their symptoms and recent acquaintances. And if they conceal information, contact tracing apps and teams could extract the truth.

The state dictates what kind of activities are permissible. The movement of people is highly restricted. ‘Stay at home’ and ‘wear a mask’ to save lives.

Those who are sick are placed under quarantine. But authorities are also on the lookout for ‘sick’ citizens who pose a threat to public safety.

‘Fake news’ peddlers are charged, pasaways are publicly shamed and penalized, and health protocol violators are arrested. The state makes arbitrary definitions of what type of behavior is lawful. Critics, journalists, and other dissenting voices are often targeted by intolerant authorities under the guise of protecting public health.

‘Stay at home’ becomes prolonged detention and ‘wear a mask’ is interpreted to put a gag on contrary views.

The crisis is far from over after months of herding people inside their homes, bombarding the public with the scientific lectures of politicians during press conferences, and mobilizing the bureaucracy based on the ruling party’s idea of addressing the pandemic.

The government is aware that the disruption is causing widespread despair that could potentially undermine confidence in authorities. Politicians are too arrogant to admit that their incompetence could have exacerbated the suffering of many.

They are haunted by their own weaknesses that drive them to be more extreme in exerting control. Draconian laws to pacify unrest, demonize critics as enemies of public health, and terrorize communities with overkill troop deployment. Medicalize a military operation, militarize a medical situation.

The raging pandemic and the self-serving maneuver of the conservative party in power have made it a challenging year for progressives.

How to expose the partisan agenda of politicians without sounding like a conspiracy theorist? How to explain the science of the pandemic, make people understand that the health risk should not be underestimated, but at the same time have them recognize too that the politics of the day should not be surrendered to politicians? How to counter the shock and awe tactics of the state with support from community frontliners? How to organize netizens, work from home professionals, and residents in hard lockdowns?

These are key issues that can only be resolved through active resistance.

Until early March, our alternative concept of politics is harnessed by the coming together of strangers to form a stronger bond against an oppressive system. People linking arms, showing solidarity, and marching as one to demand political reforms.

How can this still be feasible if mass gatherings are already prohibited? How can we build more unions if social distancing is the dominant political command?

Despite all these limitations and practical questions, the progressive movement didn’t back down. Online protests were organized, street actions were coordinated, and political alliances were formed defeating the intent of authorities to quell all forms of dissent.

There were inspiring actions from Black Likes Matter across the United States to the democracy protests in Hong Kong.

Activists are becoming more creative in coding their protests for livestreaming.

The combination of online and offline activities proved effective, but what will be counted: the number of virtual hits or the warm bodies in the streets? Well, not really ‘warm’ because activists are enforcing health protocols too.

It is revealing that authorities are advising the public to join online protests instead of street rallies. We hope it is motivated by a genuine desire to prevent the surge of COVID-19 cases. But it also reflects how authorities measure the impact of online political actions. Lesson: It is not enough to boost social media influence and make it in the trending topics of the day; our actions must be powerful enough that it becomes a traumatic experience for despotic authorities. They must feel it in realtime and force them to reconsider their remaining time in office.

We are at the early stage of mixing methods of dissent while surviving the pandemic.

How much online time should we devote each day for campaign planning, when is the right offline intervention, how should we coordinate these actions that will deliver a huge political blow? What kind of activist cadres will emerge if their political conscientization is facilitated mainly by virtual means?

We are documenting our daily struggles, webinar and all, knowing too well that our theories might have all the right answers on the most fundamental questions of the day, but we learn more and thrive better by being in the thick of the political battle. (https://www.bulatlat.com)

Mong Palatino is a Filipino activist and former legislator. He is the chairperson of Bagong Alyansang Makabayan Metro Manila. Email: [email protected]

The post Politics and resistance under a lockdown regime appeared first on Bulatlat.

Karapatan: Death penalty a legislative fiat for Duterte’s kill, kill, kill policy vs the poor, rights defenders

0

As the House of Representatives Committee on Justice hears the proposed bills for the reimposition of capital punishment or the death penalty for drug-related offenses and other heinous crimes, human rights watchdog Karapatan asserted that any measure seeking to revive death penalty, if passed into law, “would only be a legislative fiat for this murderous regime’s rabid kill, kill, kill policy against the poor and human rights defenders.”

read more

Military’s plan to regulate social media tantamount to censorship, rights groups say

“They have repeatedly weaponized social media to proliferate blatant and dangerous fabrications against activists and critics through red-tagging, or when local officials post violent ‘shoot-to-kill’ threats against the public — violent threats hewn directly from the president’s own violent and terroristic threats.”

By ANNE MARXZE D. UMIL
Bulatlat.com

MANILA – Human rights alliance Karapatan said that the military’s proposal to regulate social media is tantamount to Marcosian censorship.

Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Chief Lt. Gen. Gilbert Gapay said he would propose provisions in the implementing rules and regulations of the Anti Terror Law that will regulate the use of social media.

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) said Gapay’s proposal is against the basic constitutional and international law principles, “let alone common sense.”

NUPL President Edre Olalia said that regulating social media is “an open assault on free expression that is key to democracy, good governance and public participation.”

Olalia laughed at Gapay’s claim that terrorists are using social media for recruitment. “Such fishing expeditions are actually on the lookout for legitimate dissent, criticism and alternative views and opinions that those in power do not like, approve or agree with,” Olalia said.

“In short, it is an iron mask that covers all our senses to suffocation including our basic common sense,” he said.

No moral authority

Karapatan Secretary General Cristina Palabay said that government, the military and police have moral authority to regulate the use of social media under the guise of counterterrorism.

“They have repeatedly weaponized social media to proliferate blatant and dangerous fabrications against activists and critics through red-tagging, or when local officials post violent ‘shoot-to-kill’ threats against the public — violent threats hewn directly from the president’s own violent and terroristic threats,” Palabay said, referring to Quezon City’s head of Task Force Disiplina, Rannie Ludovica’s recent social media post.

Ludovica has given a shoot-to-kill order for violators of quarantine measures in the city.

Palabay added that it is the social media platforms of the AFP and the Philippine National Police which should be regulated for “spreading malicious lies and violent, terroristic threats against the public without letup and with rampant impunity.” (https://www.bulatlat.com)

The post Military’s plan to regulate social media tantamount to censorship, rights groups say appeared first on Bulatlat.

Will a jeepney phase-out lead to decarbonization in the Philippines?

During his 2013 visit to the Philippines, Hollywood superstar Vin Diesel said, “I love riding the jeepney. Those are the coolest buses I’ve ever seen.”

Never mind the mistake about jeepneys being buses, Diesel was right. Jeepneys are cool: the shiny, stainless hoods, the chassis often painted with wildly creative or utterly banal images, the deafening sound systems that can either give you a headache very early on the commute to work or a great morning as the music hits your senses like a shot of good, strong coffee.  

There is no debating that the Public Utility Jeep or Jeepney is truly a symbol of Filipino ingenuity. It is an icon of Filipino resilience and creativity.

Aktor na si Vin Diesel, sa isang jeepney sa Maynila, noong 2013. Mula sa kanyang Facebook page.

Jeepney history

After World War II, instead of rebuilding and widely using the more efficient trains to  become the backbone of the country’s mass transport system, building highways and more roads were prioritized.

Luckily, loads of Willy Jeeps left behind by American GIs after the war were converted, recycled, and reinvented into jeepneys. The jeepney we now know can accommodate 12 to up to 22 passengers, and its engine is tough, capable of lasting up to two decades. The stainless body or chassis of jeepeneys were locally made, previously by Sarao and San Francisco, now also by several other homegrown talents. Jeepneys are also cheap to maintain. Unlike cars that rely on casas or high-end repair shops, side street mechanics can be relied upon to a jeepney’s engine trouble.  Jeepneys also provide the cheapest means of public transport and they’re the most accessible for ordinary Filipinos, especially in the urban centers.

Passenger jeepney, post-World War II. Photo from https://www.pinterest.es/pin/344947652682788809/

In the absence of national industrialization program that could have paved the way for cheap, locally built transportation vehicles, people have grown to depend on the ever reliable king of the road.

According to PSA Philippine Yearbook 2013, there were 1.8 million registered jeepneys.  Jeepney driver associations alone employ thousands of drivers, and the segment they represent in the public transport industry also directly have an impact on the livelihood of thousands upon thousands more — barkers and starters, operators, side street mechanics, vendors and karinderya (small restaurants) owner and other informal workers.

In the last four years, however, jeepney drivers and operators have been threatened with loss of livelihood as the Duterte government pushes its so-called modernization scheme. Jeepneys are being blamed for the country’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the heavy traffic in the metro. Through the PUV Modernization Program, the government plans to phase out all “traditional jeepneys,” in place of all-imported, new and expensive “modern jeepneys.”

In a press statement by the Department of Transportation (DOTr), the department’s chief Arthur Tugade was quoted as saying “You (the drivers) can work, but do not kill the environment. Work, but take care not to destroy the next generation’s future.”

But are jeepneys really to blame for the country’s climate change problems?

Data from the Department of Energy (DOE) say otherwise, showing power generation accounts for 52% of energy-related GHG emission in the country, while transportation accounted for only 28% in 2018.

Dirty emissions

Though our country contributes less than 1% to global GHG emissions, already, it has committed to cut it further by 70% by 2030. But how serious is the government in these efforts?

In terms of emission, coal is the most carbon-intensive fuel – a very dirty source of energy.  Burning coal generates by-products such as carbon dioxide, methane, particulates and oxides of nitrogen, oxides of sulfur, mercury, and a wide range of carcinogenic chemicals and heavy metals.

Aside from these, other by-products from coal combustion such as wastewater, ash, and leachate also discharges into the environment significant stressors such as selenium, mercury and arsenic to name a few.

In Calaca, Batangas, a coal-fired power plant (CFPP) was observed by fisherfolk to have caused a decline in fish catch due to the warming of water. Doctors also determined that widespread skin diseases and upper respiratory tract infection ailments plague residents living near the CFPP.

With the chemical and heavy metals released to the air and water by coal plants, it definitely is harmful to both the environment and the people’s health.

Unfortunately, coal has dominated the country’s power generation sector since the implementation of deregulation and privatization in the 80s. 

Today, almost half of the country’s generated power comes from coal-fired power plants. As per the List of Power Plants by the DOE, there are 43 CFPPs in the country, as of 2018.

Duterte also extols coals dominance for the next 30 years. He said he was ready to open the country’s border for increased trading for big time coal as per an article in Bilyonaryo (an online publication) last July 15, 2020.

This declaration not only contradicts his earlier commitment; it is also a 180-degree turnaround to his SONA 2019 declaration to “fast-track renewable energy resources to reduce the country’s dependence on traditional energy sources such as coal.”

So who’s really to blame for the climate change in the Philippines? Largely, it’s the coal-fired plants. Jeepneys are singled out as a ruse to cover for the real intent of the phase-out: not to alleviate environmental woes, but to push forward the self-serving business agenda of big and well-connected industry players.

Unjust, illogical 

In a media briefing of Citizens’ Urgent Response to End Covid-19 (CURE Covid) — a network of individuals and organizations dedicated to the socio-economic needs of Filipinos during the COVID-19 Pandemic – an expert in public transport and leaders of transports groups discussed the problems facing the sector.

“We can say that the government is taking advantage of the pandemic to force the implementation of the PUV Modernization Program at a time when our hands are tied due to the pandemic,” said Sandy Hachasco of Malayang Alyansa ng Bus Employees and Laborers (Manibela).

The transport leaders describe the Duterte administration as “heartless and indifferent” to the plight of drivers and small operators who were already suffering due to the three-month lockdown by arbitrarily forcing the jeepney phase-out .

In a Memorandum Circular 2020-017, jeepneys were the least in the priority of vehicles to operate. “Tourist bus and vans were prioritized before jeepneys. The LTFRB refuses to allow us to get back on the streets despite having our franchises that specify our routes, our franchises that we paid for and which went through process of approval,” Steve Ranjo of Pagkakaisa ng mga Samahan ng Tsuper at Operator Nationwide (Piston) said.

The think-tank Ibon Foundation said that jeepney drivers have lost an estimated P78,000 worth of possible earnings during the three-month lockdown.

The Covid-19 restrictions imposed on labor arrangements reveal that most workers do not have the option to do Work-From-Home. Majority don’t own a car or motorcycle. Riding a bike to work is only advisable for short distance travels. Aside from the heat and the bumpy roads, most streets do not have bike lanes. Train routes and train cars are limited. As a means for daily commute for ordinary workers, taxis are impractical as they are expensive. Also, many routes are serviced by jeepneys alone.

In an Inquirer article, Ibon said that traditional jeepneys are safer against Covid-19 compared to its air-conditioned counterparts. Also, recent studies in China have shown that droplet transmissions are more likely to occur in enclose spaces and its circulation aided by air-conditioning. Regular ventilation, such as those found in jeepneys, reduces the risk of infection.

As early as March, jeepney drivers and operators have proactively undertaken innovations to ensures that physical distancing can still be observed inside jeepneys, among them the installation of plastic barriers and seat designations.

At a time when physical distancing requires more utility vehicles in the streets be available to passengers for the implementation of this health protocol to be successful, the government illogically bans jeepneys from the roads.

Metro Manila is now witness to drivers begging in the streets as the government continues to implement the jeepney ban. The Piston 6– jeepney drivers arrested for protesting against the phase-out while observing health protocols — were detained for over a week for supposedly violating public health measures – a charge Piston denied. The arrest caused public outrage generated sympathy for the jeepney drivers.

Not at drivers’, small operators’ expense

“We want to clarify that we aren’t against modernization per se. In fact, we told the government to go ahead with the modernization that is applicable at the moment, and won’t destroy the livelihood of small operators,” said George San Mateo of Piston.

Are the jeepney drivers and operators’ resistance to the PUV modernization program unfounded?

Modern jeepneys are too expensive. A single Euro 4, compliant “modern jeepney” cost between P1 million to P2 million. Even with the loan coming from Land Bank of the Philippines, the cost is way beyond the financial capacity of operators and drivers.

Single unit jeepney drivers/owners are asked to form cooperatives so they won’t lose their franchise. But in forming cooperatives, they are obliged to produce P800 per day, or P20,000 per month or more in the next seven years to amortize their bank loans. Jeepney drivers normally earn only P300-P600 daily.

Pre-pandemic scene inside a passenger jeepney. R. Jordan P. Santos

Also, only big businesses can get new franchises as franchise owners should have a minimum of 40 units.

Participatory and empowering

As in the case of all government modernization schemes, the so-called public transport improvement program of the government will affect workers such as those from the energy industries and transportation.   

What then are the alternatives to just phasing out jeepneys and rendering thousands of drivers jobless, with many having zero means of livelihood options?

A transition towards a green economy involving drivers and small operators should first and foremost prioritize the welfare of the people mostly affected by the shift. Social dialogue is essential. Social welfare programs that comprehensively support workers who will be among the hardest hit by the modernization supposedly for the purpose of greening the economy must be undertaken by the government.

A fair transition is a Just Transition. It is a holistic approach that combines social justice and climate solution.

Just Transition is specifically for workers and as defined by the International Labour Organization (ILO), “it means that the burden of change that benefits everyone will not be placed disproportionately on a few. A just transition for all implies that responses to climate change and environmental sustainability should maximize opportunities for decent work creation and ensure social justice, rights and social protection for all leaving no one behind.”

Though the PUV modernization is said to be unjust, the Philippine Government is actually not new to Just Transition as a concept and policy framework. A few years back, the Philippines was selected by the ILO for the pilot application of Just Transition together with Ghana and Uruguay. Though this is the case, the application of a humane transition remains to be seen.

Dr. Luna of the UP National Center for Transport Studies said the PUV modernization should not be arbitrary. He likened a just modernization program to a regular Filipino family improving their home. He said, “As ordinary Filipinos have limited budgets, home renovations are done step-by-step to ensure that all important needs are given priority. Starting with the tiles, then the fixtures, the paint and so forth,” he explained. 

He suggested that traditional jeepneys should not be banned from servicing the public, but improvement should be done to enhance the quality of service.

He insisted that that the move from traditional to modern jeepneys should be voluntary, and should be financially supported by the government.

The think tank IBON agrees.  “Aside from providing emergency aid to drivers and operators who suffered a loss of income for three months, government should also support drivers and operators in upgrading or replacing their units to meet safety, health and environmental standards,” it stated in a press release.

PW File Photo

Just transition

For decades, drivers and operators have been laboring to provide the Filipino people the cheapest and most accessible mass transport. They are the lifeblood of the nation linking communities to major thoroughfares, linking individuals to the rest of society.

Jeepney drivers and operators are very vulnerable to the destruction caused by global warming. From the destruction of their food supplies, calamities that destroyed their houses and flooded the streets and their communities. They know and experience the harmful effects of a warming climate. Together with the rest of us, they see the need to protect and care for the environment.

But the transition should not cause the sacrifice of their means of livelihood where they and their families have depended on for decades. It is only just for the government to reward their decades of service to the Filipino people with a sustainable, green and pro-poor solution.

Only a transition that upholds the welfare and the dignity of workers, including jeepney drivers and small operators can succeed in forging a just and sustainable low-carbon future in the transport sector of the country.

IN PHOTOS: Workers adjust to first day of re-imposed MECQ

  Those who have work went to work.     Like before, many were forced to bike or walk to work and going home.   Informal workers such as vendors and porters, try to eke out a living under the lockdown.   Drivers are back on the streets to ask passersby for help, as they […]

The post IN PHOTOS: Workers adjust to first day of re-imposed MECQ appeared first on Manila Today.

Infected 2

– “So who will treat the infected police if there are no more doctors and nurses?”
– “Duterte will take care of it. He’ll spit on the veerus.”
– “Dang those press cons!”

By DEE AYROSO
(http://bulatlat.com)

The post Infected 2 appeared first on Bulatlat.