29.4 C
Manila
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Home Blog Page 652

‘New social security act, detrimental to Filipino migrant workers’

(Photo courtesy of Migrante International)

“Rather than push OFWs to pay for social security, the government should push the employers to pay and ensure their workers’ security.”

By ALYSSA MAE CLARIN
bulatlat.com

MANILA — A migrant rights group called for the repeal of a law that requires overseas Filipino workers to cough up a monthly premium for their social security.

“It is clearly a legalized ‘hold-up’ for OFWs. There is nothing more cruel than a government that wants to make money out of its citizens’ desperate moves to work abroad,” said Arman Hernando, Migrante-Philippines president said in a statement.

In February 2018, President Rodrigo Duterte signed the Social Security Act, where, among its provisions, OFWs are required to contribute to the Social Security System. Their contribution, too, will increase from 10 percent to 12 and even up to 15 percent in 2025.

According to the draft Implementing Rules and Regulations of the act, workers need to pay their monthly contributions (P2,400/per month for land-based OFWs, and P800/per month for seafarers) first before they could get their overseas employment certificate (OEC)

Migrante led yesterday’s protest action outside the main office of the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration in Ortigas yesterday, March 26. They also held a petition signing during their program.

Such monthly premium, they said, should instead be “voluntary.”

Dire working, living conditions

Overseas Filipino groups are not happy with the said law as many migrant workers are being subjected to poor living and working conditions abroad.

After learning about the new law, former OFW Feliza Benitez was reminded of how she was practically treated like a slave in Hong Kong for 25 years. This, she said, is an added burden to Filipino migrant workers, especially those whose employers are not following their supposed salary and benefits as stipulated in the contracts they signed before leaving the country.

“Not a lot is left from our salary, even if we only subtract the expenses for our daily needs,” Benitez said, adding that it will have a “big effect, especially on their remittances for their families back home.”

“What if the employer cancels the contract after the worker pays (the contribution)? Then the three month’s payment will be for nothing,” she added.

On top of these,Benitez shared that there are migrant workers who endure poor living conditions, with some who are forced to sleep along corridors, and are only provided food once a day. Many, too, are being subjected to verbal abuse.

“Let the people decide, how much they want to pay for contribution. That’s all we want,” she said.

State exactions

This is not the first time that the government has imposed mandatory fees on Filipinos seeking job abroad.

For instance, the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration implemented a program dubbed as “Balik-Manggagawa Program” that supposedly grants financial aid to returning OFWs like Benitez.

However, even after 25 years of working abroad, Benitez only managed to avail of P20,000 financial aid from OWWA after going through countless processes.

The missing OWWA funds – at least P21 million – have yet to be properly investigated.

Related story: Investigate Owwa for missing P21 million – Migrants group

Social burden rather than security

As such, Migrante’s Hernando said the compulsory contribution is a detriment to Filipino migrant workers.

“How could we ensure a bright future (for our families) if we could not even sustain ourselves at present?” Hernando said.

The situation is worse for returning workers, the migrant rights leader said, as the IRR requires them to pay their contributions three months in advance, or a total of P7,200 before they can start working again.

Although it was also stated that the employer and the land-based OFW would be splitting the 8 percent monthly contribution, Migrante emphasized that it would only be possible for host countries who have bilateral agreements with the Philippine government.

“Employers won’t pay for that. They would insist that it is a Philippine matter and should be settled by Filipinos,” Benitez added.

Hernando said, “rather than push OFWs to pay for social security, the government should push the employers to pay and ensure their workers’ security.” (bulatlat.com)

The post ‘New social security act, detrimental to Filipino migrant workers’ appeared first on Bulatlat.

Teacher Rose–kabataang guro ng mga Lumad

0
Isinalaysay ni Jeany Rose Hayahay, 21 taong gulang at isang fulltime volunteer teacher ng Salugpungan (Lumad school) sa Mindanao ang kanilang nararanasan sa kabila nang matinding atake sa kanilang paaralan ng mga militar.

158 days

0
Ang bilang ng paglalapit
ng bayan na remata’ng sinapit
o ang paglalagkit ng pait
sa ating mga nakaambang karit?

Lawyer, doctor refused from seeing Frank Fernandez

0
“I understand the context is war – and two sides are at odds. Pero bawal bang maging makatao ‘pag magkaaway? Kung kaya ng isa, kaya din naman ng kabila, di ba?”

The People’s Choice Movement candidates will win if…

The People’s Choice Movement 10 senatorial candidates for the May 2019 elections will win if the lay people of the churches, not only Roman Catholic Church (RC), will truly campaign, vote and protect their votes for them without reservation.

The lay people selected 10 out of 32 senatorial candidates based on these criteria: “Character & Honor, Competence & Abilities, Faithfulness to public service, and Faithfulness to God, the Constitution and the laws.”

The People’s Choice Movement says: the “10 best senatorial candidates that our country and people need during these times” are Makabayan candidate Neri Colmenares, independent candidate Grace Poe and Otso Diretso candidates Gary Alejano, Bam Aquino, Chel Diokno, Samira Gutoc, Pilo Hilbay, Romy  Macalintal, Mar Roxas and Erin Tañada.

The lay people should really feel the electoral situation which was conveyed to them by the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) statement, released last January 28, 2019, an excerpt states:

“The midterm election on May 13 is crucial. In our country today the checks and balances in the government are being undermined. So far the senate is the institution in the government that is holding out as our country is inching towards total control. It is very crucial therefore that we elect candidates who are principled, courageous and who have the common good as their main concern and not their own political interests.”

RC Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo said, “Our lay leaders, with the People’s Choice Movement, have done their work of discernment. Now is the task for all the lay faithful to campaign the deserving candidates so as to counter the money and the political machineries that the TRAPO politicians are using. There are still two months for all to do this particular exercise of the Christian faith.”

The message is clear.

The People’s Choice Movement “10 best candidates” are deserving candidates. The lay people of the Philippine Churches must campaign and safeguard their votes. The task of the lay people is not only “vote-getting” for the 10 candidates, but also they should resist fraud and terrorism.

In “vote-getting,” the lay people shall ensure that the basic Christian communities in urban and in the hills will be reached out. They can do this because the Churches, especially the RC Church, Aglipayan Church, the Protestant and Evangelical Churches, have satellite or outstation chapels even in the remote areas of the country. The key persons in this campaign are still the lay people in the parishes and local churches in all dioceses, jurisdictions and conferences around the country.

If the elections are done in a free, fair and honest manner, the lay people can deliver win votes to the 10 candidates. However, elections in the Philippines are marred with fraud and violence and the rule of guns, goons and gold. The opportunity for the 10 candidates to win in this situation is slim. The lay people must resist fraud and terrorism.

The lay people must see and be convinced that President Rodrigo Duterte’s regime, through the Local Government Units (LGUs), Armed Forces of the Philippines, and Philippine National Police will not just sit, look and listen during elections. The Duterte administration is fighting hard to ensure its candidates will win in the May elections. Duterte is thinking of charter change and federalism after May elections. His candidates must win by hook or by crook for charter change and federalism to push through—a charter change characterized by unli-power and unli-wealth and no accountability to those in power. The Duterte government will use government funds, resources, facilities and COMELEC officers and personnel to dominate the electoral campaigns and processes, as have been seen with his former aide’s use of government programs as part of his campaigns.

In the provinces, especially in the barangays, the posters, streamers and other campaign materials of the opposition candidates, who are part of the 10 candidates, are prohibited and/or intentionally removed by the people who are working for the Duterte regime. This is already unfair and unjust.

In some areas, if not all, the opposition candidates are denied of the use barangay halls and municipal plazas as their campaign rally areas. Usually, the LGUs officers and personnel, including the AFP and PNP, of the Duterte regime invent many reasons in denying the opposition candidates to campaign freely.

During elections, “vote-buying” is rampant. The local administration candidates, especially candidates running for mayor and councilors, are the operators of this ‘vote-buying’ scheme for local to national posts. They have their barangay political leaders and wards that will ensure that those who received the “sample ballots and money” will follow their instructions, including signs and counter-signs during the voting period.

The other maneuvering is the “harassment and threats” made by the state forces. The voters who are identified to vote for the opposition candidates will be threatened and tagged as “communists or terrorists” supporter.  This act of terrorism will disenfranchise the voters. It will be very true in all polling precincts in Mindanao and Abra where the AFP and PNP considered as “hotspots” and to be controlled by the COMELEC. The AFP and PNP will become the personnel of the COMELEC that will administer the elections. The provinces in Bicol, Samar and Negros will be also declared as election “hotspots”.

The COMELEC will play a key role in proclaiming the winning candidates. The candidates who are engaged in fraud and unfair electoral processes could be declared winners and let the losing candidates file a formal complaints or protests to the proper bodies. Electoral protests are usually resolved within three years or more.

Thus, the lay people who choose the 10 best candidates must not only vote for them but to protect their votes. They must expose and condemn “vote-buying” and terrorism. They must be willing to participate in mass protests either in electoral tribunal and marches on the streets.

The midterm elections on May 13 is crucial indeed.

But, if the people are denied to vote freely with fairness and honesty, the lay people should not stop to find solution of the “checks and balances in the government” through elections. They must participate in people’s struggle towards genuine democracy, towards genuine progress, towards a just and lasting peace.

The post The People’s Choice Movement candidates will win if… appeared first on Manila Today.

Netizens’ free expression in grave threat with cyberlibel conviction

0

THE CONVICTION of two radio broadcasters in Kidapawan City for simply expressing their opinion in social media –supposedly meant to provide an avenue for personal opinions and narratives – is the latest attack on free expression not only of media practitioners but of everyone who dare share their stand on burning issues. Their conviction may well be a signal that will herald a new wave of attacks against free speech and expression, rights that are in fact enshrined in our very own Constitution.

We condemn in the strongest possible terms the conviction meted by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Kidapawan City to broadcasters Eric Rodinas of Radyo Natin and Larry Baja Subillaga who were charged with online libel by North Cotabato Governor Emmylou “Lala” Taliño-Mendoza.
In a decision dated March 22, the Kidapawan RTC convicted the two broadcasters of online libel with a penalty imprisonment ranging from a minimum of 4 years and one day to a maximum of 8 years and one day. The broadcasters were also ordered to pay P1 million fine, P1 million for moral damages, and P500,000 for examplary damages.

The case sprung from what Governor Taliño-Mendoza labelled as “malicious” statements posted by the two in their social media accounts last March 2017. In his Facebook post, Subillaga said that Taliño-Mendoza was fooling the people of the province, while Dugaduga said the governor became rich because of corruption. The broadcasters said that they will appeal their conviction before the Supreme Court.

This latest development proves what we have been pointing out ever since the passage of Republic Act 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012: that it can be exploited to silence criticism by well-entrenched and powerful people, especially government officials. RA 10175 not only criminalizes libel – something that has long been clamored to be decriminalized – but also sets penalties “one degree higher” than that provided for libel in the Revised Penal Code.

Weaponizing online libel adds to the long list of attacks perpetrated by state forces to the media, which include harassment of journalists, cyber attacks on newssites, legal debacles, and most heinously, killings. This latest development only intensifies the reigning climate of impunity brutely cultivated and propagated by the current administration. Online libel is yet another lethal weapon that can be abused to silence criticism by an apparent insecure government afraid of the truth. We reiterate our call to repeal the anti-cybercrime law, decriminalize libel, and to put a stop to all forms of attacks against legitimate dissent and free speech.

The post Netizens’ free expression in grave threat with cyberlibel conviction appeared first on Altermidya.

Dismiss trumped-up charges against the Rosales couple – Karapatan

0
Today, March 27, 2019, political prisoners and former public sector organizers Oliver and Rowena Rosales, will again face the trumped-up charges of illegal possession of firearms and explosives filed against them in the Regional Trial Court Branch 19 in Malolos, Bulacan.

read more

Sa Digma ng Halimaw, Isang Dokyu Teatro | Why this is necessary piece of theater from SIKAD / Tanghalang Mulong Sandoval

By ALON SEGARRA
Bulatlat.com

“…contemporary performances seem interested in exploring the range of ways in which ‘reality’ can be produced, explored, and understood. Or, to put it another way, the ways in which ‘make-believe’ is made believable.” (C. Turner and S. Behrnt 2008: 188)

‘Sa Digma ng Halimaw, Isang Dokyu Teatro’ is neither fiction nor ‘make believe’. The documentary theater play was devised from series of interviews and the transcripts were organized and woven into narratives “about the war on drugs, told from the point of view of the families of the victims of said war and others affected by it.”

I saw the play last November 22, 2018 at the Commission of Human Rights in UP Diliman. Reminded myself that my intention was to be present. I knew what I was about to watch were real accounts of incidents, portrayed by actors and later on joined by the tellers (the voices behind the stories/monologues) narrating their stories. I had to, all throughout, been conscious of my reactions, I was aware not to take pity, but to watch with empathy and respect for their courage and strength in telling and re-telling of one of the worst day/night/weeks/months/years of their lives. Unimaginable even, that one would hope never to experience. But I also had no way of controlling my tears.

Photo by Mrk Estandarte

The power of the material lies in its urgency, and in the rawness and realness of the portrayal of the actors and the tellers. As an actor, I respect the courage of the families of the victims going onstage/ in front of everyone and going through trauma again and again for each performance, hoping for healing and transformation, and justice to be served. In the performances, the lives of their loved ones are handled with so much value and given meaning and their deaths exposed as inhumane and cruel. We, the audience, experienced the everyday struggles to make ends meet, yet at the end of each day, felt the love, hope for life and family. And, in an instant, life is taken away. They just become numbers, a quota to be fulfilled. We become (state) witnesses to a system/government that authorized killings, sanctioned police brutality and leaders publicly declaring no respect for human lives.

We are at war with a system that was created to protect us, work for us, and public servants who have taken their oaths and promised to be of service to the masses, the now and for future generations. But instead, the system has turned monstrous and undeniably evil and greedy, and has abandoned the poorest of the poor of society.

Photo by Mark Lester Del Mundo Chico

I believe most of them, do not ask for much. An opportunity for a decent life, a good future, a system that encourages them to be better human beings; a piece of land they can farm on their own or a piece of land to build their homes. I believe we are not asking for much, we are asking for what is just and right. Everyone deserves a better life. We demand a government that nurtures its people and not one that kills them.

At the ending, a mother shouts, cries and raises a closed fist, urging us to stand with them and continue seeking, fighting for justice; overthrow the monster in Malacanan! Names of the victims were placed all over the room. We look for them and call out their names, as if even at that moment we know them, we’ve met them and we remember them.

Photo by Mrk Estandarte

What do you feel after being witness to eight stories knowing that there are more than 20,000 deaths and counting and at least 20,000 more mothers, fathers, children, relatives left with nothing, feeling numb, hopeless and angry? I am confronted, assaulted with the reality that the poor, innocent lives are sacrificed for this so-called ‘war on drugs’, and any glimpse of hope or transformation is killed in an instant. One hopes that everything was just fiction, but truth is, it’s not. Even when the last sentence is said, lights fade out, we are confronted and reminded the whole time: the reality that the killings never stop, and possibly at that very moment, in another place, another victim falls, and somebody is grieving and wailing for justice.

Sa Digma ng Halimaw is necessary theater. Because truths, no matter how painful and brutal, are told. And outside the four walls, as we go out, it is necessary to fight. (http://bulatlat.com)

The post Sa Digma ng Halimaw, Isang Dokyu Teatro | Why this is necessary piece of theater from SIKAD / Tanghalang Mulong Sandoval appeared first on Bulatlat.